Correct, Ananda, correct. The way that Sariputta
answered the question is correct.1 Ananda, sukha and
dukkha (pleasure and pain, happiness and suffering) are merely things
that rely upon a certain paccaya (condition) in order to arise (they
are paticca-samuppannadhamma). On what paccaya do sukha
and dukkha depend? Sukha and dukkha depend on the paccaya
that is contact (contact = sense experience). Whoever speaks in this way
speaks in line with what we say and does not abuse us with untruthful words;
rather, he speaks correctly and those Sahadhammika who speak
accordingly will not be censurable.
Ananda, among the four groups of Samana and Brahmins who
teach about Karma: Those Samana and Brahmin teachers of Karma who claim that sukha
and dukkha are done by oneself, even the sukha and dukkha
of which they teach must rely upon contact to arise. Those Samana and Brahmin
teachers of Karma who claim that sukha and dukkha are things
that others do to one, even the sukha and dukkha of which they
teach must rely upon contact to arise. Those Samana and Brahmin teachers of
Karma who claim that sukha and dukkha are things both done by
oneself and that others do to one, even the sukha and dukkha of
which they teach must rely upon contact to arise. Those Samana and Brahmin
teachers of Karma who claim that sukha and dukkha are things
that arise without oneself or others doing it, even the sukha and dukkha
of which they teach must rely upon contact to arise.
Ananda, among the four groups of Samana and Brahmins who
teach about Karma: Those Samana and Brahmin teachers of Karma who claim that sukha
and dukkha are done by oneself, those Samana and Brahmins are thick,
refraining from contact, would they feel any sukha and dukkha?
That is impossible. Those Samana and Brahmin teachers of Karma who claim that sukha
and dukkha are things that others do to one, those Samana and Brahmins
are thick, refraining from contact, would they feel any sukha and dukkha?
That is impossible. Those Samana and Brahmin teachers of Karma who claim that sukha
and dukkha are things both done by oneself and that others do to one,
those Samana and Brahmins are thick, refraining from contact, would they feel
any sukha and dukkha? That is impossible. Those Samana and
Brahmin teachers of Karma who claim that sukha and dukkha are
things that arise without oneself or others doing it, those Samana and
Brahmins are thick, refraining from contact, would they feel any sukha
and dukkha? That is impossible.
Ananda, when kaya (the body door that functions
under the influence of ignorance) exists, internal sukha and dukkha
naturally appear due to kayasancetana (volition regarding the physical)
as the cause.
Ananda, when vaca (the speech door that functions
under the influence of ignorance) exists, internal sukha and dukkha
naturally appear due to vacisancetana (volition regarding the verbal)
as the cause.
Ananda, when mano (the mind door that functions
under the influence of ignorance) exists, internal sukha and dukkha
naturally appear due to manosancetana (volition regarding the mental)
as the cause.
Ananda, with avijja as the condition, the mental
nature naturally concocts kayasankhara (influences causing physical
happenings), which is the condition causing internal sukha and dukkha
to arise, sometimes all by oneself; ... sometimes relying upon stimulation
from others; ... sometimes self-aware; ... sometimes unaware.
Ananda, with avijja as the condition, the mental
nature naturally concocts vacisankhara (influences causing verbal
happenings), which is the condition causing internal sukha and dukkha
to arise, sometimes all by oneself; ... sometimes relying upon stimulation
from others; ... sometimes self-aware; ... sometimes unaware.
Ananda, with avijja as the condition, the mental
nature naturally concocts manosankhara (influences causing mental
happenings), which is the condition causing internal sukha and dukkha
to arise, sometimes all by oneself; ... sometimes relying upon stimulation
from others; ... sometimes self-aware; ... sometimes unaware.
Ananda, avijja is the principal factor that
insinuates itself in all these dhammas.
Ananda, through the fading away and remainderless
quenching of that avijja, kaya (the body door that functions through
ignorance) no longer exists as the condition causing internal sukha and
dukkha to arise.
Ananda, through the fading away and remainderless
quenching of that avijja, vaca (the speech door that functions through
ignorance) no longer exists as the condition causing internal sukha and
dukkha to arise.
Ananda, through the fading away and remainderless
quenching of that avijja, mano (the mind door that functions
through ignorance) no longer exists as the condition causing internal sukha
and dukkha to arise.
Ananda, through the fading away and remainderless
quenching of that avijja, sancetana as field (kheta,
field for sprouting of internal sukha and dukkha), as basis (vatthu,
basis for internal sukha and dukkha), as object (ayatana,
direct condition of internal sukha and dukkha), or as adhikarana
(instrument causing internal sukha and dukkha) no longer exist
as the condition causing internal sukha and dukkha to arise.